When growth becomes harder to find, most businesses start looking for something new.
New products, concepts, experiences, and ways to engage customers are arriving almost daily. Retailers are investing in new formats, suppliers are searching for the next point of difference, and brands are under constant pressure to demonstrate relevance. Yet amid all this activity, an uncomfortable question sits in the background. How much of this change is actually being driven by customers?
As consumers navigate what many describe as a polycrisis environment, businesses are dealing with increasingly fragmented customer bases. The K-shaped economy has created a widening divide between households willing and able to spend more and those carefully managing every dollar. Yet there is a risk that businesses become distracted by the customers they would like to attract while paying less attention to the customers who built the business in the first place.
In grocery retail, that tension is becoming increasingly visible. Many retailers are investing heavily in premium experiences, premium private-label ranges, expanded foodservice offerings and concepts designed to elevate the shopping experience. Many of these initiatives are succeeding with particular customer groups. The question is whether they are being pursued at the expense of the shoppers who continue to drive the majority of weekly transactions.
For many consumers, the priorities remain remarkably consistent. They want fair pricing on the products they buy most often. They want a store that is easy to navigate and a shopping trip that can be completed efficiently. Above all, they want the experience to feel straightforward rather than complicated. These are hardly revolutionary demands, yet they remain central to how many shoppers judge value.
The same tension exists well beyond supermarkets. In hospitality, product development and manufacturing, there is often an assumption that customers are looking for something dramatically different. Sometimes they are. Often they are not.
A restaurant may decide to refresh its menu because the chef wants a new challenge. A manufacturer may decide a product requires reformulation because a new ingredient has become fashionable. A retailer may conclude that a familiar offer needs reinventing because competitors appear to be doing something more exciting. In each case, the motivation for change can originate inside the business rather than with the customer.
Customers, however, are often more predictable than businesses expect. The diner who comes in every Friday night for a steak may not be looking for a reinterpretation of the dish. They may simply want the steak they enjoyed last week. The shopper who purchases the same products each week is frequently buying familiarity, certainty and trust as much as the products themselves.
Perhaps the reality is that businesses become bored with their own offer long before customers do.
The pressure becomes even greater when trading conditions are difficult. When sales soften or customer traffic slows, management teams naturally start looking for ways to reignite momentum. New products, refreshed menus, reformulated recipes,, and new concepts spark discussion, generate optimism, and offer a potential pathway back to growth.
There is nothing unusual about that response. Every business wants to find the next opportunity, and every leadership team wants a way forward. The danger is assuming that customers have stopped buying because they are looking for something different.
Sometimes they are. Sometimes they are simply spending less.
If customers are visiting less often because household budgets are under pressure, a new flavour, ingredient or concept will not necessarily address the underlying issue. If consumers are becoming more selective about where they spend their money, the challenge may be less about novelty and more about value, convenience, consistency and trust.
The temptation is often to search for the next big idea. The harder question may be whether customers are actually asking for one.
This tendency is particularly visible in product development. Businesses can become captivated by unusual ingredients, alternative production methods or concepts that feel disruptive simply because they differ from what already exists. Within product development teams, these ideas can generate genuine excitement. They feel innovative because they are unfamiliar.
An unconventional ingredient may attract media attention and industry discussion, but consumers tend to assess products through a more practical lens. Does it taste better? Is it better value? Does it solve a problem? Or is it simply different?
The industry may become fascinated by the possibilities of a disruptor ingredient. Consumers may simply wonder why anyone thought the product needed changing.
Novelty and innovation are not necessarily the same thing. One may attract attention. The other needs to give customers a reason to buy.
Of course, there are plenty of examples of customers embracing significant change. Online grocery shopping, contactless payments, meal kits and premium private label all challenged established behaviour. What they had in common was that they solved a customer problem or improved convenience. Consumers did not adopt them because they were different. They adopted them because they offered a better outcome.
Looking across retail, foodservice and FMCG, many of the most successful innovations have not fundamentally changed customer behaviour. Instead, they have improved upon something customers already valued. They have made products easier to use, easier to access, better quality, more affordable or more convenient. They have strengthened the existing proposition rather than replacing it.
Businesses already have access to many of the signals that matter. Sales data, purchasing patterns, loyalty programmes and customer behaviour provide a constant stream of feedback about what customers genuinely value. The challenge is not always finding the information. Sometimes it is resisting the urge to ignore it.
History is filled with examples of products, brands and concepts that changed in pursuit of growth only to discover that customers were more attached to the original proposition than management realised. In some cases, the decision can be reversed. In others, the relationship has already been damaged.
Perhaps that is the real challenge. Businesses spend every day thinking about their products, stores, menus and brands. Customers do not.
The breakfast cereal bought every week, the Friday night steak, or the supermarket shop completed every Saturday morning may feel repetitive to the people selling it. To the customer, it is often exactly why they keep coming back.
Businesses often become bored with their own offer long before customers do. Understanding the difference may well prove to be more valuable than the next innovation.
Explore our digital archive here
