WE WILL NEVER HAVE A HELLO KITTY WINE—AND HERE’S WHY

The food industry has confirmed it will continue to be at the forefront in protecting Kiwi kids from unhealthy advertising.

advertisingtokids

Exactly the kind of advertisement we will never, ever see again

The ASA Children’s Codes have been reviewed lately by a panel led by former Court of Appeal Judge, Sir Bruce Robertson. The panel recommended ‘significant changes to further restrict advertising to children,’ including the adoption of a new combined code to cover advertising to children and young people.

On its part, the NZ Food and Grocery Council has announced it will support the review. According to chief executive Katherine Rich, the FGC itself is working on a new industry Advertising Pledge, as an additional response to the Government’s Childhood Obesity Plan.

At present, the Code for Advertising to Children states that ads must be clearly recognisable by kids and separated from other non-advertising content. Kids must not be encouraged to eat too much, or to lead inactive or unhealthy lifestyles. Most importantly, ads must not use characters that are well-known to children to promote unhealthy food or drinks.

hellokittyhedThis is exactly why a line of Hello Kitty wine, launched this month in the US but marketed in Europe and Asia since 2007, is very unlikely to ever hit our shores. The popular cartoon cat displayed on packaging would, in fact, appeal to minors, especially a young, pre-adult female audience.

Apart from ‘international threats’, domestic companies are well aware of their responsibilities towards the younger generation.
“When I recently surveyed our member companies about advertising and children, they fell into two groups: they either do not advertise to children at all or they abide by the clear ASA codes,” said Katherine Rich. “Our members regard these Codes as very important to their businesses and treat compliance with them as the right and responsible thing to do.”